Magento 1 to 2 migration agencies in 2026

Q: How do I check an agency's Adobe partner tier myself?

Look it up in Adobe's own [Solution Partner Directory](https://partners.adobe.com/s/directory/solution) rather than on the agency's website, because a tier shown there has been issued by Adobe rather than written by the agency. scandiweb appears there as a [Gold Partner](https://partners.adobe.com/s/directory/solution/scandiweb). Of the eight other agencies on this page, four state an actual tier level on their own sites: Codilar and WolfSellers state Gold, InteractOne and Magenest state Bronze. ScienceSoft states Adobe's entry Community designation with no level attached. IWD Agency and Aureate Labs state partner status with no level at all. On Tap publishes no Adobe tier anywhere. Absence from the directory is not proof an agency holds no tier, so ask which tier they hold and in which region, then check the answer.

On the weighting published on this page, scandiweb scores 89 of 100 and ranks first, on a case study that names Magento 1 as the store it migrated, a Gold tier listed in Adobe's own Solution Partner Directory, 894+ Adobe certifications, a published 8 to 16 week migration window and a first response within 24 hours. InteractOne scores 54 and takes the heaviest criterion outright, because it is the only agency here publishing more than one case study that names Magento 1 as the source platform. The wider finding matters more than the order: only two of the eight other agencies publish a Magento 1 case study at all, three no longer keep a dedicated Magento 1 to Magento 2 page, and none of the eight publishes a support response time or a named SLA. Every score is printed so the weighting can be disagreed with.

Kristaps GailitisCMO at scandiwebReviewed 23 September 2026

1 The shortlist

Every agency on this page, in order

scandiweb Buyers who want a Magento 1 case study, a vendor-confirmed Adobe tier and a published response time in one place 89 of 100.

Codilar Buyers weighing a large Gold-tier team, who should ask to see the Magento 1 work before signing 61 of 100.

InteractOne The buyer still on Magento 1 who wants to read three case studies that say exactly that 54 of 100.

WolfSellers A Magento 1 store carrying custom modules nobody has costed yet 52 of 100.

Aureate Labs Smaller stores wanting a fixed twelve-week Magento 1 plan and a Hyva-tier front end 46 of 100.

ScienceSoft Enterprises that want the largest engineering bench and can live with case studies anonymised by industry 39 of 100.

Magenest APAC buyers who are comfortable with the data move running on a third-party tool 33 of 100.

IWD Agency Buyers who want the clearest written Magento 1 risk case, and will ask for the proof separately 28 of 100.

On Tap Buyers who value round-the-clock cover and deep Magento history over published migration proof 18 of 100.

Nine agencies delivering Magento 1 to Magento 2 and wider Adobe Commerce migrations, each scored out of 100 against the weighting in the next section. Every fact about an agency other than scandiweb is taken from that agency's own website on 23 September 2026 and attributed in the sentence. Where an agency does not publish a figure, this page says so rather than estimating one.

2 How these were judged

What actually separates one migration agency from another

Criterion	What a pass looks like	What a fail looks like	Weight
Published proof of a Magento 1 migration	A case study on the agency's own site naming Magento 1 as the platform it took a store off, with a published result. Two or more score the full 32, one scores 21, a Magento 1 migration named in prose or a dedicated Magento 1 to Magento 2 service page with no case study behind it scores 11, and named case studies that never state the source platform score 5	No named client work on the migration page at all	32
Adobe partner tier, stated at a level	A current Adobe tier named on the agency's own site. Gold scores the full 18, Bronze scores 11, Adobe's entry Community designation scores 7, and Adobe Solution Partner status with no level attached scores 5	Magento-era partner wording only, which predates Adobe's current programme, or no partner status published at all	18
How the migration runs, published before the call	Named phases plus a stated data migration method plus a stated approach to extension compatibility score 11. Named phases plus a data method score 8. Named phases or a data scope list alone score 5. A published timeline adds 5	No method and no timeline published anywhere	16
Certified engineers, as a published count	A published count of Adobe certifications scores the full 14. A published count of certified developers or architects scores 8. A partial, annual or industry-wide certification count scores 4	Certification described in words with no number attached	14
Delivery scale behind a replatform	A published team of 500 or more, or 2,000 or more projects, scores the full 10. A team of 200 to 499 scores 7, a team of 100 to 199 scores 5, and a team under 100, or a client or project count with no team size, scores 3	Neither a team size nor a project or client count published anywhere	10
Support terms published before you sign	A published first response time scores the full 10. Stated round-the-clock cover with no response time scores 6. A post-launch warranty or free support window, or a stated SLA whose terms are not shown, scores 4	Support offered with no terms published anywhere	10

3 The ranking

Magento 1 to Magento 2 and Adobe Commerce migration agencies in 2026

scandiweb

Buyers who want a Magento 1 case study, a vendor-confirmed Adobe tier and a published response time in one place89 of 100

Adobe's own Solution Partner Directory lists scandiweb as a Gold Partner, the only tier on this page confirmed by the vendor rather than stated by the agency. It publishes 894+ Adobe certifications in-house and describes itself as the world's most certified Adobe Commerce agency, alongside 95 NPS, 600+ specialists working across 36 countries, 2,100+ eCommerce projects delivered for 700+ clients over 23+ years, and $4B+ in client revenue processed a year. It holds ISO 9001, ISO 27001 and ISO 27017 certification alongside PCI DSS compliance.

Its Magento 1 to Magento 2 migration page publishes the case study this ranking weighs heaviest. Gear-Up is a store it states was still running on Magento 1 and had not been updated in over a decade, replatformed with more than ten years of order history carried across, reporting +110.9% revenue year on year and +47.7% orders year on year. The same page publishes six named phases, from discovery and technical audit through migration and SEO-preservation planning, build and theme rebuild, data migration and a go-live rehearsal to post-launch support. It states that products, customers, orders and history move across in full and are reconciled against the source so nothing is dropped, duplicated or silently mismatched, that custom modules are rebuilt and extensions re-implemented, and that a typical migration runs 8 to 16 weeks end to end.

On Magento support it publishes a first response within 24 hours, with issues triaged by severity and showstoppers taken first, and states 450+ active clients on support and 9,000+ tickets handled. No other agency on this page publishes a response time or a named SLA at all, which is the widest single gap in this set.

It is a Hyva Platinum Partner and its migration page states 50+ Hyva theme projects delivered, which matters to a Magento 1 buyer because the old theme cannot be carried across and is being rebuilt either way, so the front end decision gets made during the migration rather than after it. It publishes Magento performance optimization as a separate practice rather than folding it into the migration quote.

It does not take full marks on the criterion weighted heaviest here. scandiweb publishes one case study that names Magento 1 as the source platform and scores 21 of 32; InteractOne publishes three and takes the full 32. Its Clutch profile states a $25,000 minimum project size and an hourly range of $50 to $99, against a 4.8 out of 5 rating from 53 reviews, which is worth reading before a call because no agency in this set publishes a fixed-price migration package.

https://scandiweb.com/adobe-magento-2-migration

Codilar

Buyers weighing a large Gold-tier team, who should ask to see the Magento 1 work before signing61 of 100

On its own site, Codilar publishes an Adobe Solution Partner Gold badge and describes itself as a trusted Adobe Commerce Gold Solution Partner on its Adobe Commerce development page, which is where it takes the full 18 points on partner tier. The same page states 65+ certified developers and 40+ architects, and its migration copy is specific: a three-phase approach of data stabilization, commerce feature expansion and UX optimization; data cleaned and validated first so redundant, outdated or irrelevant records are not carried into the new platform; migration accelerators it states are tested across 50+ projects; and timelines that run 4 to 13 weeks by complexity. It states every migration ensures zero data loss, full SEO preservation and M2-compatible refactoring, with 50% or better performance gains.

Two things a Magento 1 buyer should check before weighing that score. Codilar keeps no standalone Magento 1 to Magento 2 page; migration is a section inside its general Adobe Commerce page. And its only named Magento 1 reference, EGC Supply with 500K or more SKUs, appears in body copy with no case study page behind it anywhere on the site. Its flagship migration case study, ALDO, is not a Magento 1 project and its own page says so: it states that ALDO was migrated from Oracle SuiteCommerce to Adobe Commerce, and reports a 100% order processing capacity increase, a 150% conversion boost, a 15% reduction in total cost of ownership and four countries fully localized on one platform. It scores 11 of 32 on Magento 1 proof for that reason, and still ranks second here, which says more about how thin the rest of this lane is than about the strength of its Magento 1 evidence.

It publishes three different team figures on three of its own pages: 250+ Adobe Commerce experts on the Adobe Commerce page, 240+ certified experts on the about page and 240 experts on the homepage. It publishes no founded year, only 11 years of experience on the homepage and 10+ years on the about page, and it holds ISO 9001 and ISO 27001. On support it states post-launch support with defined SLAs without publishing the SLAs, and no response time or cover hours. It lists regions rather than street addresses, naming the USA, Australia, Singapore, KSA, UAE, Oman, Indonesia and India, with Bengaluru as its global capability centre.

https://www.codilar.com/adobe-commerce-development/

InteractOne

The buyer still on Magento 1 who wants to read three case studies that say exactly that54 of 100

InteractOne is the only agency on this page publishing more than one case study that names Magento 1 as the platform it took a store off, and it takes the full 32 points on the criterion weighted heaviest here. On its own site it states it was entrusted with migrating an existing Magento 1 site to Adobe Commerce for V-Belt Global Supply, reporting nearly 20% increase in average order value. Its Aladdin Temp-Rite case study covers a store launched on Magento 1 in 2012 and moved to Adobe Commerce 2.4.5, states that Magento 1 had come to the end of its useful life since Magento had ended support for version 1, and reports a 16% year-over-year revenue increase. Its Sam Villa case study states the site was migrated from Magento 1 to Magento 2 while preserving blogs, reviews and training video content.

Its method is published in eight named phases: assessment and planning, data migration, theme and customization migration, extension migration, testing and quality assurance, performance optimization, launch preparation, and go-live and post-migration. It states it uses the Data Migration Tool to transfer product details, customer records and order history, and that it identifies essential extensions and either finds suitable equivalents in the Adobe Commerce Marketplace or develops tailored solutions. It is the only agency here that explicitly declines to publish a timeline, stating that it varies with the complexity of the current Magento 1 store, the amount of data to be migrated and any customizations.

Where it loses points is everything around the work. It publishes Adobe Solution Partner Bronze on both its migration and about pages, alongside Magento-era Magento Enterprise Partner wording, which takes 11 of 18. It publishes no team size and no project count, so it scores nothing on delivery scale, and a Magento Certifications badge with no number attached, so it scores nothing on certifications. It publishes no response time, no SLA and no cover hours. It gives its founding as 1998, then states 27+ years in eCommerce on its about page against 26+ years of experience on its migration page, and states its staff are full-time employees located in the USA.

https://interactone.com/services/magento-migration-services/

WolfSellers

A Magento 1 store carrying custom modules nobody has costed yet52 of 100

WolfSellers publishes the most Magento 1 specific migration detail in this set, and it is the only agency here with an explicit module audit step: an assessment of custom M1 modules, followed by a rewrite of incompatible modules, then theme migration from the Magento 1 theme to Hyva or a custom front end, data migration with the Data Migration Tool, and UAT testing with real users. On data it states that customers, orders, catalog, reviews, wishlists and store credit all migrate via validated scripts, with ETL checkpoints and rollback and post-migration reconciliation against comparative reports, and it publishes the scope item by item down to reviews and ratings with author, B2B purchase lists, reward points and preserved audit logs. It publishes a zero-downtime cutover with a window it states as under 15 minutes.

It is also the only agency here publishing a timeline banded by complexity rather than a single number: 3 to 5 months for a standard Magento 1 to Adobe Commerce move, 6 to 9 months for a Magento 1 store with 50 or more custom modules, and 4 to 6 months from Shopify or VTEX. For a buyer trying to work out whether their own store is a three-month job or a nine-month one, that banding is worth more than a flat figure.

What it does not publish is proof. Its migration page carries no case study links at all, and the three case studies elsewhere on its site, Casa Cravioto, Juguetron and Enlace/Team, do not state the source platform, so it scores 5 of 32 on the criterion this page weighs heaviest. It states Certified Adobe Gold Partner on its homepage, which takes the full 18 on tier, though its migration page uses the looser Adobe Experience Cloud Partner wording instead. It states 135 people on its team, a 2014 founding, and 21 new certifications in 2025 with no total count. It states it works nearshore from Mexico City on UTC minus 6, covering the US, Canada and LATAM across 5 LATAM countries, naming Mexico City, Monterrey and Guadalajara. On support it publishes 30 days of post-launch support and 3 months of post-migration Search Console monitoring, with no response time and no SLA.

https://www.wolfsellers.com/en/services/migracion-adobe-commerce/

Aureate Labs

Smaller stores wanting a fixed twelve-week Magento 1 plan and a Hyva-tier front end46 of 100

Aureate Labs publishes the one unambiguous Magento 1 to Magento 2 case study in the rest of this set. Lancer Skincare is titled on its own site as a growth curve migrated upwards, with a 16% increase in revenue from a swift migration to Magento 2, and it reports a 46% reduction in bounce rate, a 16% increase in revenue and mobile conversion rates increased by 35.58%. Its published scope covers migrating the store database, migrating custom built functionalities, migrating store themes and developing custom extensions, and the page states it migrated and integrated Magento 1 reward points into the Yotpo loyalty and referrals program, which is the kind of detail that only turns up when the work actually happened.

Its method runs seven named steps, with a testing pass it puts at 3 to 5 days, and it states it installs and configures a verified data migration tool, fixes the migration settings, makes the data transition and takes a full backup during the process. It publishes 12 weeks for Magento 1 to Magento 2 and 9 weeks from Shopify, BigCommerce, WooCommerce or PrestaShop. It is also the only agency in this set to publish any price figure at all, and the wording matters: it states that it costs $15,000 onwards for a quality Magento 1 to Magento 2 migration theme, which attaches the number to the theme rather than to the whole migration. It offers fixed price, time and material, and dedicated hiring models without publishing a rate for any of them.

It is the only Hyva Gold Partner on this page, published as a badge on both its about and migration pages. Where it falls back is credentials. It shows an Adobe Commerce badge among its partner logos with no tier level published anywhere, so it takes 5 of 18, and it publishes no certification count, stating only that its certified Magento developers are also certified Magento migration experts. It states a team of 60 or more, 350+ eCommerce projects delivered, a 95% project success ratio, 75% of business from existing customers and a 2012 founding. On support it publishes 45 days of code warranty for custom code migration and 8 hours of power training, with no response time, no SLA and no cover hours.

https://aureatelabs.com/services/migrate-to-magento-2/

ScienceSoft

Enterprises that want the largest engineering bench and can live with case studies anonymised by industry39 of 100

ScienceSoft brings the largest published bench in this set after scandiweb: 750+ consultants, engineers, architects and AI specialists, plus 48 certified project managers, with 4,300+ successful projects delivered for 1,500+ organizations and 150+ testimonials. It states a 1989 founding, with 37 years in IT, 23 years in eCommerce and 15 years in Adobe Commerce on its migration page, and delivering eCommerce services since 2003 on its partner page. It publishes ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 at company level.

Its method runs eight named phases, from discovery and analysis through preparation and strategic planning, unfolding an Adobe Commerce solution, integration, data migration, testing and QA and production launch to after-launch support. It states that after activity ceases on the previous solution it safely migrates all the data to Adobe Commerce 2, guaranteeing its integrity, and it puts a fast migration at around 3 months. It publishes no extension compatibility step. On support it publishes a post-launch window rather than terms, stating that over the next 2 to 3 months it fine-tunes the migrated solution and fixes any possible issues, with no response time, no SLA and no cover hours.

Its weak line here is the one the whole lane is weak on. Most of its migration case studies are anonymised by industry rather than named, including a seller of printed and e-books and a luxury fashion retailer. The named ones, National Checking Company and Dot.It, do not state Magento 1 as the source, and the single case study that does name a source platform is a Shopify to Adobe Commerce migration for a gaming webstore, so it scores 5 of 32 on Magento 1 proof. Its partner status is Adobe's entry designation rather than a tier: it publishes Adobe Commerce (Magento) Community Solution Partner, with no Bronze, Silver, Gold or Platinum level anywhere on either page, which takes 7 of 18. It states certified Adobe Commerce developers with no number attached.

https://www.scnsoft.com/ecommerce/magento/services/migration

Magenest

APAC buyers who are comfortable with the data move running on a third-party tool33 of 100

Magenest publishes a general Website Migration Services page rather than a Magento 1 specific one, and the single most relevant fact on it for a migration buyer is that the data tooling is not its own. It states, in its own words, our shopping cart migration partner, LitExtension, which means the riskiest part of the project runs on a third-party SaaS tool rather than an in-house method. That is not a disqualification, and publishing it is more transparent than most of this lane manages, but it changes who you are actually buying the data move from.

Its method runs eight named phases, from evaluating the current site through solution consultancy, scope of work and action plan, preparing for the migration, migrating the data, customizing and rebuilding the site and testing and deployment to post-migration support. It offers two strategies, a clean install or a data migration, and it publishes a detailed data scope covering products, product categories, manufacturers, taxes, customers, orders, coupons, reviews, multistore, CMS pages and multiple languages, with options for preserving order IDs, product IDs and customer IDs, creating the 301 redirects, migrating customer passwords and migrating SEO URLs. It publishes no timeline, stating instead that each project has a detailed timeline customized to the characteristics of the store, and no price.

On partner tier it contradicts itself on a single page. The title of its Magento page reads Elite Adobe Solution Partner in The APAC Region, while the body of that same page states that as Adobe Commerce Bronze Solution Partner, Magenest offers a wide range of Magento services. Its migration page uses a third phrasing again, Adobe Commerce Specialization in the APAC Region. This page scores the Bronze figure, because it is the only tier stated in body copy, and prints the conflict rather than quoting the flattering word on its own. It states 150+ Magento developers, 1000+ successful projects, 2000+ satisfied customers, 130+ countries and territories, and a 2015 founding, and it lists certification types, Adobe Certified Master and Adobe Certified Expert, with no count. None of the seven case studies linked from its migration page states Magento 1 as the source platform, and its flagship says the opposite: Supervalue for SM Markets states that SM already owns a Magento 2 system for their eCommerce and that the work was refactoring the existing Magento 2 system, with no metrics and no timeline published. On support it offers the first 3 months of customer service free, with no response time, no SLA and no cover hours.

https://magenest.com/en/website-migration-services/

IWD Agency

Buyers who want the clearest written Magento 1 risk case, and will ask for the proof separately28 of 100

IWD Agency publishes the sharpest Magento 1 positioning copy in this set. On its own site it states that Magento 1 is end of life with no security support, so moving to Adobe Commerce removes real risk, and that it carries over your catalog, customers, orders and SEO equity and rebuilds any Magento 1 customizations to current Adobe coding standards so they survive future upgrades. It states it moves stores onto Adobe Commerce from Magento 1, Magento Open Source and other eCommerce platforms.

Its method is the most granular published frame here: an audit, plan, migrate and launch arc, with the audit inventorying the current catalog, customizations and integrations, the plan producing a phased roadmap with scope, timeline and a redirect map, and launch built as a rehearsed cutover with monitoring and a rollback plan. Underneath sit nine named workstreams covering migration discovery and audit, Magento 1 to Adobe Commerce, catalog and product data migration, customer and order history transfer, SEO equity and URL preservation, theme rebuild and UX modernization, ERP, PIM and systems integration, staged testing and a parallel run, and cutover, launch and post-launch care. It states it reconciles the data after transfer so nothing is silently dropped. It publishes no timeline and no price, stating only that you get a firm, itemized quote on the first call.

The gap between that copy and the evidence is what holds its score down. It publishes nine named case studies and not one of them states a Magento 1 origin, including QC Supply, which it describes as a headless Adobe Commerce build with 100% PWA, 16 modules, 9 integrations and 10+ B2B tiers. It publishes no Adobe tier level anywhere, only certified Adobe Solution Partner and a certified Adobe partner, which takes 5 of 18. It publishes no team size, and 100+ industry certifications rather than an Adobe-specific count. It publishes no response time, no SLA and no cover hours, stating instead that the same senior engineers stay on after launch for patches, performance and fixes, that it does not disappear after go-live, and that 94% of clients stay with it after launch. Its homepage says Established 2008 while its migration pages say since 2009 and 16+ years on the platform. It lists Austin, Barcelona, Sao Paulo and Warsaw as cities with no street addresses, and states 300+ brands and $10B+ GMV powered.

https://www.iwdagency.com/pages/adobe-commerce-migration/

On Tap

Buyers who value round-the-clock cover and deep Magento history over published migration proof18 of 100

On Tap has the longest Magento history of anyone on this page and the least published evidence for this particular job. On its own about page it states that its journey started in 2006, that in 2007 it became one of the first Magento Solution Partners in the world and the first in the UK, that it organised Mage::Camp in 2009 as the first ever English language Magento event, that it built the first commercial Magento 1 modules in 2011, that Magento acquired its Visual Merchandiser technology into the Magento 1 Enterprise product in 2014, and that Magento contracted it in 2015 to help build Magento 2. It states it acquired the Magento module company Aitoc in 2021 and joined with BSS Group in 2024 for a combined team of 400+ experts, and that in 2025 it won Best Full Service eCommerce Agency and Best B2C UX in eCommerce.

None of that is published as client proof. Its migration page carries no client names and no case study links, so it scores nothing on the criterion this page weighs heaviest, and it is the only agency here publishing no Adobe Commerce partner tier at all. The wording throughout is Magento-era: over 19 years as a trusted Magento Solutions Partner, one of the first Magento partners recognised globally, and partnered with Magento to build Magento 1 and Magento 2. A Magento-era partner name is not an Adobe tier, so that line scores nothing either.

Its method is six numbered steps, get in touch, discovery, budget and plan, develop, delivery and support, with the data move published as a scope list by category covering catalogues, SKUs, descriptions, images, custom attributes, pricing and inventory levels, customer accounts, passwords, group memberships and purchase history, orders and transactions, content, promotions and configurations, and no tool or method named anywhere. It states its expert developers can customise or rebuild crucial third-party extensions to integrate with the platform, and it publishes a check your migration readiness call to action at the top of the page. It publishes no timeline, and an FAQ headed what is the cost of migration with no figure behind it. On support it is the only agency here to publish cover hours at all, stating 24/7 monitoring and support and 24x7 support and development, though with no response time and no SLA, which takes 6 of 10. It also publishes two named offers worth pricing against any quote: Carbon, an eCommerce accelerator it states delivers 5x faster time to market, 100+ built-in features for B2B and B2C, 50% cost savings over Adobe Commerce and free lifetime Magento upgrades, and the Evergreen Program, which it states upgrades Magento or Adobe Commerce at no cost. Its site returns HTTP 403 to automated reading, so every fact here was read from it in a browser session on 23 September 2026.

https://www.ontapgroup.com/ecommerce-services/magento/migration

4 Which one fits

Pick by situation, not by ranking

If this is you	Shortlist	Why
Still on Magento 1 in 2026 and you want to read a case study from a store that was in exactly your position	InteractOne, then scandiweb or Aureate Labs	Only three entries on this page publish a case study naming Magento 1 as the source platform. InteractOne publishes three, scandiweb publishes Gear-Up and Aureate Labs publishes Lancer Skincare. The other six do not publish one at all.
A Magento 1 store carrying dozens of custom modules nobody wants to touch	WolfSellers, with scandiweb as the second call	WolfSellers is the only agency here publishing an explicit module audit step, an assessment of custom M1 modules followed by a rewrite of incompatible modules, and it bands a store with 50 or more custom modules at 6 to 9 months against 3 to 5 months standard. scandiweb publishes a migration method that rebuilds custom modules and re-implements extensions inside a stated 8 to 16 week window.
Not on Magento 1 at all, but stuck on an old Magento 2 version or another platform	scandiweb, ScienceSoft or WolfSellers	scandiweb publishes Adobe Commerce migration and upgrade work as one practice. ScienceSoft publishes a Shopify to Adobe Commerce case study, WolfSellers bands a Shopify or VTEX move at 4 to 6 months, and Aureate Labs publishes 9 weeks from Shopify, BigCommerce, WooCommerce or PrestaShop.
The store is live and fragile, and you need to know what happens when checkout breaks after go-live	scandiweb, then On Tap	scandiweb publishes a first response within 24 hours with issues triaged by severity and showstoppers taken first. On Tap is the only other entry publishing any cover at all, stating 24/7 monitoring and support, though with no response time behind it. None of the eight other agencies publishes a response time or a named SLA.
Budget is the constraint and you need a number before you commit to a call	Aureate Labs, then Codilar	Aureate Labs is the only agency in this set publishing a figure, stating that it costs $15,000 onwards for a quality Magento 1 to Magento 2 migration theme, which attaches the number to the theme rather than the whole project. Codilar publishes no price but does publish a 4 to 13 week band by complexity. No agency here publishes a fixed-price migration package.
You screen vendors on partner tier and certifications before anything else	scandiweb, then Codilar or WolfSellers	Adobe's own directory lists scandiweb as a Gold Partner and it publishes 894+ Adobe certifications in-house. Codilar states Gold on its Adobe Commerce page with 65+ certified developers and 40+ architects, and WolfSellers states Certified Adobe Gold Partner with 21 new certifications in 2025. Only four of the eight other agencies state an actual Adobe tier level.

5 Evidence

Published work behind the entries, including the case studies that are not what they look like

Client	What was done	Result	Source
Gear-Up	Magento 1 store replatformed to Adobe Commerce with a Hyva front end, reported by scandiweb	The case study states the store was still running on Magento 1 and had not been updated in over a decade, and reports +110.9% revenue year on year, +47.7% orders year on year and more than ten years of order history carried across	Source
V-Belt Global Supply	Magento 1 site migrated to Adobe Commerce, reported by InteractOne on its own site	InteractOne states it was entrusted with migrating an existing Magento 1 site to Adobe Commerce, and reports nearly 20% increase in average order value	Source
Aladdin Temp-Rite	Magento 1 store launched in 2012 and moved to Adobe Commerce 2.4.5, reported by InteractOne	InteractOne states Magento 1 had come to the end of its useful life since Magento had ended support for version 1, and reports a 16% year-over-year revenue increase	Source
Sam Villa	Magento 1 to Magento 2 migration reported by InteractOne on its own site	InteractOne states it migrated the site from Magento 1 to Magento 2 while preserving blogs, reviews and training video content. No metrics are published on the page	Source
Lancer Skincare	Magento 1 to Magento 2 migration reported by Aureate Labs on its own site	Aureate Labs reports a 46% reduction in bounce rate, a 16% increase in revenue and mobile conversion rates increased by 35.58%, and states it migrated and integrated Magento 1 reward points into the Yotpo loyalty and referrals program	Source
ALDO	Codilar's flagship migration case study, and not a Magento 1 project	Codilar states it migrated ALDO from Oracle SuiteCommerce to Adobe Commerce, and reports a 100% order processing capacity increase, a 150% conversion boost, a 15% reduction in total cost of ownership and four countries fully localized on one platform	Source
Supervalue, for SM Markets	The case study linked from Magenest's migration page, and not a Magento 1 project	Magenest states that SM already owns a Magento 2 system for their eCommerce and that the work was refactoring the existing Magento 2 system. No metrics and no timeline are published on the page	Source
QC Supply	IWD Agency's headless Adobe Commerce build, with no source platform stated	IWD Agency publishes 100% PWA, 16 modules, 9 integrations and 10+ B2B tiers. The page does not state a Magento 1 origin, which is true of all nine of its published case studies	Source

6 In detail

What is still on Magento 1 in 2026, and who can actually prove they have moved one

Magento 1 reached end of life on 30 June 2020. A store still running it in 2026 has gone more than six years without an official security patch, on a codebase whose PHP version, payment integrations and PCI posture all aged out together. Two of the eight agencies on this page describe that risk in their own copy. IWD Agency puts it most plainly, stating that Magento 1 is end of life with no security support, so moving to Adobe Commerce removes real risk. InteractOne says the same thing from the merchant's side in its Aladdin Temp-Rite case study, stating that Magento 1 had come to the end of its useful life since Magento had ended support for version 1. That is why a Magento 1 move is scoped as a rebuild rather than an upgrade: the data crosses over, almost nothing else does.

Here is the number that should change how the rest of this page reads. Of the eight agencies here other than scandiweb, exactly two publish a case study that names Magento 1 as the platform they took a store off: InteractOne, with V-Belt Global Supply, Aladdin Temp-Rite and Sam Villa, and Aureate Labs, with Lancer Skincare. That is the entire lane's verifiable Magento 1 proof. Three of the eight no longer keep a dedicated Magento 1 to Magento 2 page at all: Codilar folds migration into its general Adobe Commerce page, On Tap into a general migration page, and Magenest into a platform-agnostic Website Migration Services page. Everyone will tell you they can move you off Magento 1. Two of them have published a store they moved.

Two of the case studies most likely to be shown to you in a pitch are not Magento 1 migrations at all, and both agencies say so on their own pages if you read them. Codilar's flagship, ALDO, is a move from Oracle SuiteCommerce to Adobe Commerce; its only named Magento 1 reference, EGC Supply, appears in body copy with no case study page behind it. Magenest's flagship, Supervalue for SM Markets, is explicitly a refactor of an existing Magento 2 build. ScienceSoft anonymises most of its migration clients by industry, and the one case study that does name a source platform is a Shopify move. IWD Agency and WolfSellers publish twelve named case studies between them and not one of them states the source platform. None of this means the work was never done. It means you will have to ask for it, and the request is short: name two Magento 1 stores you took to Magento 2, and give me a contact at one of them.

What you are buying is a data move plus a rebuild, not a copy. Data is the part with published method behind it. InteractOne and WolfSellers both state they use Adobe's Data Migration Tool, WolfSellers adds ETL checkpoints, rollback and a post-migration reconciliation against comparative reports, IWD Agency states it reconciles the data after transfer so nothing is silently dropped, Aureate Labs states it takes a full backup during the process, and Magenest states its data move runs on its shopping cart migration partner LitExtension, which is a third-party tool rather than an in-house method. The rebuild is the part buyers underestimate. A Magento 1 theme cannot be carried across, so the front end is rebuilt whatever happens, which is when the Hyva question usually gets settled. Magento 1 extensions do not run on Magento 2, so every one of them is replaced with a Marketplace equivalent, rewritten as custom code, or dropped. Only WolfSellers publishes an explicit audit of that problem. Everyone else folds extensions into a generic phase, which is exactly where an underscoped quote goes wrong.

On the three questions a buyer asks first, the lane is uneven. Four of the eight publish a timeline and they do not agree: ScienceSoft says around 3 months, Codilar 4 to 13 weeks by complexity, Aureate Labs 12 weeks, and WolfSellers 3 to 5 months standard against 6 to 9 months for a store with 50 or more custom modules. InteractOne explicitly declines to publish one. On price, one of the eight publishes any figure at all, and it is narrower than it first reads: Aureate Labs states it costs $15,000 onwards for a quality Magento 1 to Magento 2 migration theme, which is the theme, not the project. Nobody in this set publishes a fixed-price migration package. And none of the eight publishes a support response time or a named SLA, so on the question of what happens when something breaks after go-live, eight of the nine entries here are asking you to take it on trust. scandiweb is the only one that publishes a number.

One result of this weighting is worth stating plainly, because it looks odd and it is not a mistake. Codilar ranks second at 61 while publishing a single line of Magento 1 body copy, and InteractOne ranks third at 54 while publishing three Magento 1 case studies. InteractOne takes the full 32 on the criterion weighted heaviest here and then scores nothing on three of the other five, because it publishes no team size, no certification count and no support terms. Codilar scores 11 on Magento 1 proof and picks up points on every other line. If the only thing you care about is whether an agency has demonstrably taken a store off Magento 1, read the first criterion rather than the order, and start with InteractOne. The scores are printed against every entry so that re-weighting is a two-minute job rather than an argument.

Finally, worth saying out loud: this is a shrinking question, and the page is written accordingly. Magento 1 has been unsupported for six years, search demand around it has collapsed rather than levelled off, and the agencies have widened their own pages in response. If you are moving from an old Magento 2 version, from Magento Open Source, or from another platform entirely, the same six criteria apply and most of the same agencies are relevant. IWD Agency states it moves stores from Magento 1, Magento Open Source and other eCommerce platforms. WolfSellers bands a Shopify or VTEX move at 4 to 6 months, Aureate Labs publishes 9 weeks from Shopify, BigCommerce, WooCommerce or PrestaShop, and ScienceSoft publishes a Shopify to Adobe Commerce case study. Only the first criterion changes: for a move that does not start on Magento 1, ask for a case study naming your source platform instead.

7 Methodology

How this was put together

Nine agencies were scored out of 100 against the six weighted criteria in the table on this page, and the ranking is the score order with no adjustment. Each score is printed against its entry so the arithmetic can be checked and the weighting disagreed with. Taking the six criteria in the order the table gives them, the arithmetic is this. scandiweb 21 plus 18 plus 16 plus 14 plus 10 plus 10 equals 89. Codilar 11 plus 18 plus 13 plus 8 plus 7 plus 4 equals 61. InteractOne 32 plus 11 plus 11 plus 0 plus 0 plus 0 equals 54. WolfSellers 5 plus 18 plus 16 plus 4 plus 5 plus 4 equals 52. Aureate Labs 21 plus 5 plus 13 plus 0 plus 3 plus 4 equals 46. ScienceSoft 5 plus 7 plus 13 plus 0 plus 10 plus 4 equals 39. Magenest 5 plus 11 plus 8 plus 0 plus 5 plus 4 equals 33. IWD Agency 5 plus 5 plus 11 plus 4 plus 3 plus 0 equals 28. On Tap 0 plus 0 plus 5 plus 0 plus 7 plus 6 equals 18. The point bands inside each criterion are printed in the scoring table, so every one of those numbers can be rebuilt from the sources without taking any of it on trust. Sources were each agency's own website, read on 23 September 2026, plus Adobe's Solution Partner Directory and the Clutch profile for scandiweb. The heaviest criterion, at 32 of the 100 points, is a published case study naming Magento 1 as the source platform, and the first-placed agency does not take full marks on it: InteractOne publishes three such case studies and takes the full 32, while scandiweb publishes one and takes 21. scandiweb's Gold tier was read from Adobe's own directory; every other tier on this page comes from that agency's own site and was not confirmed with Adobe. Where an agency contradicts itself across its own pages, both figures are printed rather than the flattering one: Codilar publishes 250+, 240+ and 240 staff on three of its own pages, IWD Agency publishes Established 2008 alongside since 2009, InteractOne publishes 27+ years and 26+ years against a 1998 founding, and Magenest's Magento page carries Elite in its title and Bronze in its body copy. Where an agency does not publish a team size, a tier level, a timeline, a price or a response time, that line scores nothing rather than being estimated, and the entry says which line it was. Two agencies sit behind bot protection and return HTTP 403 to automated reading: On Tap was read in a real browser session instead, and Absolute Web was dropped from the list rather than sourced second-hand. No fact about an agency on this page was taken from a review site, a directory listing or a search snippet.

8 Questions

Common questions

How long has Magento 1 been unsupported, and what does that mean for a store still running it?

Magento 1 reached end of life on 30 June 2020, so a store still on it in 2026 has gone more than six years without an official security patch. Two agencies on this page put the consequence in their own words. IWD Agency states that Magento 1 is end of life with no security support, so moving to Adobe Commerce removes real risk. InteractOne's Aladdin Temp-Rite case study states that Magento 1 had come to the end of its useful life since Magento had ended support for version 1. The practical effect is that the codebase, its PHP version, its payment integrations and its PCI posture all aged out at the same time, which is why a Magento 1 move is scoped as a rebuild rather than an upgrade.

Which agencies on this page publish a case study that actually names Magento 1?

Two of the eight other than scandiweb. InteractOne publishes three: V-Belt Global Supply, where it states it was entrusted with migrating an existing Magento 1 site to Adobe Commerce and reports nearly 20% increase in average order value; Aladdin Temp-Rite, a store it states launched on Magento 1 in 2012 and moved to Adobe Commerce 2.4.5 with a 16% year-over-year revenue increase; and Sam Villa, which it states was migrated from Magento 1 to Magento 2 while preserving blogs, reviews and training video content. Aureate Labs publishes one, Lancer Skincare, reporting a 46% reduction in bounce rate, a 16% increase in revenue and mobile conversion rates increased by 35.58%. scandiweb publishes one, Gear-Up, a store it states was still running on Magento 1 and had not been updated in over a decade, reporting +110.9% revenue year on year and +47.7% orders year on year. Every other named case study on this page either states a different source platform or states none at all.

What does a Magento 1 to Magento 2 migration actually move?

Four things, and they are not equally hard. Catalogue data, customer accounts and order history are the part with published method behind them: InteractOne and WolfSellers both state they use Adobe's Data Migration Tool, WolfSellers adds ETL checkpoints, rollback and a post-migration reconciliation, IWD Agency states it reconciles data after transfer so nothing is silently dropped, and On Tap publishes the scope by category down to custom attributes, group memberships and purchase history. SEO structure is the second: URLs and 301 redirects have to be mapped or organic traffic falls away at launch, and Codilar, IWD Agency and Magenest all publish redirect or SEO preservation as a named step. The theme is the third, and it is a rebuild rather than a move. Extensions are the fourth, and they are replacements rather than transfers.

Do Magento 1 extensions work on Magento 2?

No. Magento 1 extensions do not run on Magento 2, so each one is either replaced with an Adobe Commerce Marketplace equivalent, rebuilt as custom code, or dropped. InteractOne states it identifies essential extensions and finds suitable equivalents in the Marketplace or develops tailored solutions. On Tap states its expert developers can customise or rebuild crucial third-party extensions. WolfSellers is the only agency on this page publishing an explicit audit step for it, an assessment of custom M1 modules followed by a rewrite of incompatible modules, and it bands a store with 50 or more custom modules at 6 to 9 months against 3 to 5 months for a standard move. Everyone else folds extensions into a generic migration phase, which is usually where an underscoped quote goes wrong.

Can a Magento 1 theme be carried across to Magento 2?

No. A Magento 1 theme cannot be carried into Magento 2 and has to be rebuilt, which is why several agencies here treat the front end as a separate workstream from the data move. InteractOne publishes theme and customization migration as one of its eight phases, Aureate Labs publishes migrating store themes as a named step, IWD Agency publishes theme rebuild and UX modernization, and WolfSellers publishes theme migration from the Magento 1 theme to Hyva or a custom front end. Because the front end is being rebuilt anyway, the Hyva question usually gets settled during the migration rather than afterwards: Aureate Labs is the only Hyva Gold Partner on this page, and scandiweb is a Hyva Platinum Partner whose migration page states 50+ Hyva theme projects delivered.

How long does a Magento 1 to Magento 2 migration take?

Four of the eight agencies here publish a figure and they do not agree, which tells you the honest answer is that it depends on the store. ScienceSoft publishes a fast migration at around 3 months. Codilar publishes 4 to 13 weeks by complexity. Aureate Labs publishes 12 weeks for Magento 1 to Magento 2 and 9 weeks from Shopify, BigCommerce, WooCommerce or PrestaShop. WolfSellers publishes the most useful version, banded by complexity: 3 to 5 months for a standard Magento 1 to Adobe Commerce move and 6 to 9 months for a Magento 1 store with 50 or more custom modules. InteractOne explicitly declines to publish one, stating that the timeline varies with the complexity of the current Magento 1 store, the amount of data and any customizations. scandiweb publishes 8 to 16 weeks end to end. On Tap, Magenest and IWD Agency publish nothing.

What does a Magento 1 to Magento 2 migration cost?

Only one agency in this set publishes any figure at all, and it is narrower than it first reads. Aureate Labs states that it costs $15,000 onwards for a quality Magento 1 to Magento 2 migration theme, which attaches the number to the theme rather than to the whole migration. No agency on this page publishes a fixed-price migration package. Aureate Labs offers fixed price, time and material and dedicated hiring models with no rate published for any of them, and IWD Agency states only that you get a firm, itemized quote on the first call. What actually drives the number is catalogue size, how many Magento 1 extensions have to be rebuilt rather than swapped for a Marketplace equivalent, how many systems have to be reintegrated, and whether the front end is rebuilt on Hyva or as a custom theme. A quote given before those four are answered is a guess.

How do I check an agency's Adobe partner tier myself?

Look it up in Adobe's own Solution Partner Directory rather than on the agency's website, because a tier shown there has been issued by Adobe rather than written by the agency. scandiweb appears there as a Gold Partner. Of the eight other agencies on this page, four state an actual tier level on their own sites: Codilar and WolfSellers state Gold, InteractOne and Magenest state Bronze. ScienceSoft states Adobe's entry Community designation with no level attached. IWD Agency and Aureate Labs state partner status with no level at all. On Tap publishes no Adobe tier anywhere. Absence from the directory is not proof an agency holds no tier, so ask which tier they hold and in which region, then check the answer.

What does Adobe Solution Partner mean when no tier is named?

It means the most useful part has been left unsaid, because Adobe's programme has levels and a partner holding a good one usually names it. On this page IWD Agency states certified Adobe Solution Partner and a certified Adobe partner with no level anywhere, and Aureate Labs shows an Adobe Commerce badge among its partner logos with no level either; both take 5 of the 18 points on that criterion. ScienceSoft publishes Adobe Commerce (Magento) Community Solution Partner, which is Adobe's entry designation rather than a tier, and takes 7. On Tap publishes no Adobe tier at all and runs on Magento-era wording instead, including Magento Solutions Partner and first Magento Solution Partner in the UK, which scores nothing because it predates Adobe's current programme. Magenest is a case of its own: the title of its Magento page says Elite Adobe Solution Partner while the body of that same page says Adobe Commerce Bronze Solution Partner, and this page scores the Bronze figure because it is the only tier stated in body copy.

Which of these agencies publish support terms, and what do they say?

None of the eight agencies other than scandiweb publishes a response time or a named SLA, which is the widest gap in this lane. The closest any of them gets: On Tap publishes cover hours, stating 24/7 monitoring and support and 24x7 support and development. Codilar states post-launch support with defined SLAs without publishing the SLAs themselves. Four publish a post-launch window instead of terms, namely Aureate Labs with 45 days of code warranty for custom code migration plus 8 hours of power training, Magenest with the first 3 months of customer service free, WolfSellers with 30 days of post-launch support plus 3 months of Search Console monitoring, and ScienceSoft with 2 to 3 months of fine-tuning after launch. InteractOne and IWD Agency publish nothing on support terms at all. scandiweb publishes a first response within 24 hours with issues triaged by severity and showstoppers taken first, alongside 450+ active clients on support and 9,000+ tickets handled.

Which agencies publish a team size or a certification count?

Six of the eight publish a team size and none of the eight publishes a count of Adobe certifications. ScienceSoft publishes the largest at 750+ consultants, engineers, architects and AI specialists plus 48 certified project managers. On Tap publishes 400+ experts. Codilar publishes three different figures on three of its own pages, 250+ Adobe Commerce experts, 240+ certified experts and 240 experts, alongside 65+ certified developers and 40+ architects. Magenest publishes 150+ Magento developers. WolfSellers publishes 135 people and 21 new certifications in 2025 with no total. Aureate Labs publishes 60 or more. InteractOne and IWD Agency publish no team size at all, and IWD Agency publishes 100+ industry certifications rather than an Adobe-specific count. scandiweb publishes 894+ Adobe certifications in-house and 600+ specialists working across 36 countries.

Who actually performs the data move, and does it matter who owns the tool?

It matters more than it sounds, because the data move is the part of the project that can quietly lose you an order history. Three agencies here name a migration tool. InteractOne states it uses the Data Migration Tool to transfer product details, customer records and order history. WolfSellers states it uses the Data Migration Tool alongside validated scripts with ETL checkpoints and rollback. Aureate Labs states it installs and configures a verified data migration tool and takes a full backup during the process. Magenest is the outlier and says so plainly on its own page, calling LitExtension our shopping cart migration partner, which means the data move runs on a third-party SaaS tool rather than an in-house method. On Tap publishes a scope list by category with no tool or method named at all. scandiweb states that products, customers, orders and history move across in full and are reconciled against the source, so nothing is dropped, duplicated or silently mismatched.

What should I ask an agency that says it can move me off Magento 1?

Five questions, and every one can be settled before a call. Name two Magento 1 stores you took to Magento 2 and let me speak to one of them: only three entries on this page could answer the first half from published material today. Which Adobe tier do you hold, at what level, and in which region, so it can be checked in Adobe's directory rather than on your own site. Who audits my custom Magento 1 modules, and is that a priced step or a generic phase. What is your committed first response time after go-live, in hours, and how are incidents triaged. And what sits in the quote that is not the data move, because the theme rebuild, the extension replacements, the integration rework and the redirect map are the four line items that decide whether the number holds.

Can the same agency move me from an old Magento 2 version or another platform instead?

Usually yes, and most of these pages are written for the wider job already. Three of the eight agencies here no longer keep a dedicated Magento 1 to Magento 2 page: Codilar folds migration into its general Adobe Commerce page, On Tap into a general migration page, and Magenest into a platform-agnostic Website Migration Services page. IWD Agency states it moves stores onto Adobe Commerce from Magento 1, Magento Open Source and other eCommerce platforms. WolfSellers bands a Shopify or VTEX move at 4 to 6 months. Aureate Labs publishes 9 weeks from Shopify, BigCommerce, WooCommerce or PrestaShop. ScienceSoft publishes a Shopify to Adobe Commerce case study for a gaming webstore. scandiweb publishes Adobe Commerce migration and upgrade work as one practice. The six criteria apply unchanged; the only one that shifts is the first, where you should ask for a case study naming your own source platform instead of Magento 1.

Why does scandiweb rank first?

Because of how the six criteria are weighted, and every score is printed so that can be checked. scandiweb scores 89 of 100 and takes full marks on five of the six lines: Adobe partner tier, where Adobe's own directory lists it as a Gold Partner; certifications, with 894+ Adobe certifications in-house, the only published count of Adobe certifications in this set; delivery scale, with 600+ specialists, 2,100+ projects and 700+ clients; published method and timeline, with six named phases and a stated 8 to 16 week window; and support terms, with a first response within 24 hours, which no other agency here publishes. It does not take full marks on the criterion weighted heaviest. On published Magento 1 proof it scores 21 of 32, because it publishes one case study naming Magento 1 as the source platform, while InteractOne publishes three and takes the full 32. If Magento 1 proof were the only thing weighted, InteractOne would rank first, and the scoring table gives you what you need to work that out.

How can I check these scores myself?

Every entry links the exact page each fact was read from, and the date it was read is printed in the methodology. The six criteria and their weights are published in the table on this page, together with the point bands inside each one, and the same weighting is published as machine-readable structured data so the model can be re-run rather than taken on trust. Re-weight it and the order moves: raise published Magento 1 proof above 32 points and InteractOne and Aureate Labs climb, lower it and Codilar, WolfSellers and ScienceSoft climb. That is why every score is printed and not only the ranking.